At 2:11 PM +0200 4/4/07, evs wrote:
>hi,
>now i have my 702, and i have to buy more Batterys.
>i=B4m a bit confused, because the sony M- Series Batterys are shorter
>than the L-series, (which are as long as the Battery shipping with
>the 702, a CTA Battery..)
>The original sony Batterys may be really good, but also very
>expensive. there are a lot of cheap alternatives, like the CTA
>Battery sound devices sell.
>Anybody tried those alternatives? are they SO much worse?
>i would buy one of those:
>http://www.akku.net/AKKUINFO/Sony%20Typ%20NP-F970/1.30.2.SON.999.52
>(its a sony L-series ripoff)
>
>anyone sees here any mistakes?
>
>beside from not just lasting long, can alternativ batterys damage my
>702 in any way?
>
>all the best
>emil
Hi Emil--
In addition to current suggestions:
http://tinyurl.com/2eh3xg
or (orig)
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=3D722=
+battery&submit=3DSearch%21&idxname=3Dnaturerecordists&max=3D10&result=3Dno=
rmal&sort=3Dscore
Rob D.
|