Subject: | Re: MKH vs Telinga EM23 noise |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Sat Sep 2, 2006 10:01 am (PDT) |
Posted by: "Klas Strandberg" > Rob, - as far as I know, the MKH mic's use much more current than the mic= 's > you have tested with the Rolls. > It might very well be that the Rolls start to generate noise when that hi= gh > current is being squeezed out of it. The MKH, except for the 80 & 800 use 2ma current, which is fairly low for studio mics. The 80 & 800 use 3ma. These currents are well below the official specs for a phantom power supply. Sennheiser's rating is for the phantom to be 48 volts plus/minus 4 volts. I've used them down to 36 volts with no problem. Though I was not measuring the calibrated noise level. By ear they were fine. Portable phantom power supplied from low voltage batteries is often a problem. You might want to check the Rolls phantom power voltage under load and see just what you are supplying. The unloaded voltage won't tell you, it will draw down under load. Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: MKH vs Telinga EM23 noise, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: MKH vs Telinga EM23 noise, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: MKH vs Telinga EM23 noise, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: MKH vs Telinga EM23 noise, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU