Hi Rob,
Thanks for giving this a listen. I am running MKH's through Rolls
and into mic in of Sony RH10. The EM23's are going directly into mic
in using only PIP. I put new batteries into the Rolls immediately
before running the test.
I have uploaded an un-normalized or decoded file of the MKH 40/30 and
also the un-normalized file of the EM23's both recorded at the 28
level. They are at the bottom of the group on the page at
http://tinyurl.com/hx9nq
One thing that confuses me is that I thought the MKH's were more
sensative than the EM23's being rated at 25mV/Pa's as opposed to 10-
Message: 11.
Subject: 5mV/Pa for the EM23. The un-normalized files argue against this.
Thanks,
Scott
--- In Rob Danielson <>
wrote:
>
> Hi Scott- We'll, something odd is going on. Is just the 40/30 pair
> going through through the Rolls and the em-23 running on PIP or are
> both running through the PB224? Sure the batteries are fresh? If
both
> pairs are going through the Rolls, can you upload the M-S 40-30 rec
> level "28" files un-decoded and un-normalized? Rob D.
>
> At 11:07 PM +0000 8/31/06, scottsherk27 wrote:
> >I recently began experimenting with a Sennheiser MKH 30-40 M/S rig.
> >I've been running this through the Rolls PB224 and then into a Sony
> >RH10 Hi-MD. I seem to be experiencing too much high-end noise,
> >especially compared to what I'm used to with my pair of Telinga
> >EM23's. I've posted some crude test recording on my site. I`ve
> >recorded the same clock with both the EM23's and the MKH's with
gain
> >of 22 and 28 on the RH10. I only normalized the files. I would
> >appreciate an assessment of this high-end noise. Here is the page:
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/hx9nq
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Scott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Microphones are not ears,
> >Loudspeakers are not birds,
> >A listening room is not nature."
> >Klas Strandberg
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rob Danielson
> Peck School of the Arts
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> http://www.uwm.edu/~type/audio-art-tech-gallery/
>
|