Subject: | Re: recording rig advice |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:27 pm (PDT) |
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" > For omni's in moisture the mkh-20's or mkh-800 are widely accepted > top performers. For omni's in low or no moisture, MK2's would get my > nod over mkh-20's for ambience. Ultimate: 2 mkh-800's > (multi-pattern). For omni's on a budget: AT3032's Just curious, Rob, is your recommendation of MK2's over MKH-20's for outdoor ambiance based on studio experience or nature recording experience with the MK2's? I ask because I don't remember you talking about your experience nature recording with the MK2's. What have you found with these out nature recording? I agree, the AT3032's do look to work ok as a low cost alternative to the MKH. That based on only a very short experience with them in a Modified SASS so take it with a big grain of salt: http://frogrecordist.home.mindspring.com/docs/mod_sass.html#AT3032 Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: recording rig advice, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: recording rig advice, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: recording rig advice, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Re: recording rig advice, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU