| Subject: | Re: Re: Edirol R-4 and performance |
|---|---|
| From: | derek holzer <> |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:31:55 -0600 |
I summed up available feedback on the R-4 in this thread: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/20861 Have a look. The main discrepancy is that some said the preamps were too hot, some said too quiet and noisy. I don't think the issue ever got sorted out, so I'm interested to hear that someone has been getting good environmental recordings with it. best, d. Bruce Wilson wrote: > Anyone know how noisy the R-4 XLR preamps are compared to the 722 or the= > Tascam HD-P2? I think it's time to upgrade my Marantz 670, and preamp noi= se > is the thing that bothers me most about my current recorder (otherwise it= 's > a pretty good unit). -- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 33: "Cluster analysis" ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Sound Devices 722 field question, Wild Sanctuary |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Sound Devices 722 field question, Gianni Pavan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Edirol R-4 and performance, Bruce Wilson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Edirol R-4 and performance, Martyn Stewart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU