naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: MicroTrack 24/96

Subject: RE: MicroTrack 24/96
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:55:45 -0800
I agree it is portable and handy this way, I have tried it with MKH-20's and
the mics expose the recorders pre-amp. I have just used it outdoors with a
pair of self powered ECM-55's, not too bad and maybe this should be the way
to go with the recorder but I find the gain poor unless you boost the DB to
27. I haven't tried the mini-phone plug, is the quality ok?
Any samples you can play me Eric?

Frustrated in Seattle even after the Seahawks won (for which I hate American
Football) :(

Martyn

****************************************

Martyn Stewart

Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543 W121.98428

e-mail: 
Tel: 425-898-0462

Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!

*****************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Eric Benjamin
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:45 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] MicroTrack 24/96

>"Martyn Stewart" wrote:
> Has anyone actually used one of these in the field? I would be interested 
> to
> find out other peoples opinions before I take the bloody thing back!!!

Martyn,
I have one and I've used it for quite a lot of field recordings.  It does 
have flaws, it's true, but the small size, portability, and ease of transfer

of files really work for me.  I have used both the PIP with the mini-phone 
plug input and the phantom power on the TRS inputs.  Mostly I use it with a 
pair of home-brew microphones which use the PIP supply.  I have the recorder

in one pocket and the microphones in another.  It gives me unprecedented 
freedom of movement.  Most of all, it increases the likelihood that I will 
actually have the recorder when I need it!

I have experienced no problems with the low phantom voltage - and I wouldn't

expect to.  Most of the microphones that I used are rated to work from 
phantom supplies between 12 Volts and 48 Volts.  I'm sure that there are 
some that don't work properly with 30 Volts phantom power; I just haven't 
encountered them.  In any case I would be incredibly surprised (and 
disappointed!) if a microphone were to be damaged by low phantom power 
voltage.  After all, every microphone is exposed to the intermediate 
voltages as the phantom power is switched on and ramps up.

I have no doubt that the decision to use 30 Volts phantom power was a 
considered one on the part of M-Audio.  Phantom powering is an inefficient 
way of getting power to the microphone.  Consider the case of the Schoeps MK

series microphones that I like.  The internal supply is 6 Volts and 4.5 mA, 
which is achieved by drawing 4.5 mA from two 48 Volt supplies.  Basically, 
that means that the whole setup consumes 8 times as much power as it has to.

Dropping the phantom supply to 30 Volts results in the same performance, but

only wastes half as much power.  It's a compromise.  I'm more concernted 
about the use of TRS connectors.

I haven't done it, but it shouldn't be difficult to rig up an adapter to 
recharge the device through its USB port.  If you would like for me to work 
up a schematic, contact me off-list.

Eric Benjamin




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU