I agree it is portable and handy this way, I have tried it with MKH-20's and
the mics expose the recorders pre-amp. I have just used it outdoors with a
pair of self powered ECM-55's, not too bad and maybe this should be the way
to go with the recorder but I find the gain poor unless you boost the DB to
27. I haven't tried the mini-phone plug, is the quality ok?
Any samples you can play me Eric?
Frustrated in Seattle even after the Seahawks won (for which I hate American
Football) :(
Martyn
****************************************
Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543 W121.98428
e-mail:
Tel: 425-898-0462
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
*****************************************
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Eric Benjamin
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:45 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] MicroTrack 24/96
>"Martyn Stewart" wrote:
> Has anyone actually used one of these in the field? I would be interested
> to
> find out other peoples opinions before I take the bloody thing back!!!
Martyn,
I have one and I've used it for quite a lot of field recordings. It does
have flaws, it's true, but the small size, portability, and ease of transfer
of files really work for me. I have used both the PIP with the mini-phone
plug input and the phantom power on the TRS inputs. Mostly I use it with a
pair of home-brew microphones which use the PIP supply. I have the recorder
in one pocket and the microphones in another. It gives me unprecedented
freedom of movement. Most of all, it increases the likelihood that I will
actually have the recorder when I need it!
I have experienced no problems with the low phantom voltage - and I wouldn't
expect to. Most of the microphones that I used are rated to work from
phantom supplies between 12 Volts and 48 Volts. I'm sure that there are
some that don't work properly with 30 Volts phantom power; I just haven't
encountered them. In any case I would be incredibly surprised (and
disappointed!) if a microphone were to be damaged by low phantom power
voltage. After all, every microphone is exposed to the intermediate
voltages as the phantom power is switched on and ramps up.
I have no doubt that the decision to use 30 Volts phantom power was a
considered one on the part of M-Audio. Phantom powering is an inefficient
way of getting power to the microphone. Consider the case of the Schoeps MK
series microphones that I like. The internal supply is 6 Volts and 4.5 mA,
which is achieved by drawing 4.5 mA from two 48 Volt supplies. Basically,
that means that the whole setup consumes 8 times as much power as it has to.
Dropping the phantom supply to 30 Volts results in the same performance, but
only wastes half as much power. It's a compromise. I'm more concernted
about the use of TRS connectors.
I haven't done it, but it shouldn't be difficult to rig up an adapter to
recharge the device through its USB port. If you would like for me to work
up a schematic, contact me off-list.
Eric Benjamin
|