Subject: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test |
---|---|
From: | Jim Lee <> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:16:46 -0500 |
Rob, Any chance you could include the Edirol R-1 in your revised round of testing? Klas indicates it is quieter and has a couple of other advantages as well. A head to head comparison between the Edirol and MicroTrack devices would really useful to people looking to get started on a budget. Has such a comparison already been done somewhere else. Those two devices seem to be the only real contenders at that price point (MD excluded). Jim Rob Danielson wrote: >http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/MicroTrack_NH900_722Compare.mov >=20 > <<<snip>>> -- Jim Lee - Bamboo Turtle Studio http://www.bambooturtle.com Home of the Rock Nest Monster http://www.bambooturtle.us/Rock_Nest_Monster.html ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: ordering a 722, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: NSS Listening Party - Saturday, 12/3/05 - 5 PM to 9 PM, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test, Tim Gray |
Next by Thread: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU