| Subject: | Re: Finding Shure 183 |
|---|---|
| From: | Walter Knapp <> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:53:12 -0500 |
From: Dan Dugan <> > > Walt, you wrote, > > >>>By the published specs the MX183 is less sensitive than the WL183. > > > It is. Have you run the two off against each other to test this? Could you comment on the impedance, I'm sure you understand it better than I. The MX183 has a impedance of 150 ohms, the WL183 is spec'd at 1000 ohms. I'm pretty sure my Portadisc is going to find the MX183 a better match, as it's designed for low impedance mics like the MKH. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Advice on recording ocean waves, Aaron Ximm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Understanding M-S, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Finding Shure 183, Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Finding Shure 183, Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU