Actually, Rich, while recording at Gray Ranch, a 500,000 acre site in
the N. Mexico panhandle once owned by the Nature Conservancy, we
worked solid for 2 weeks day and night and only heard one flyover.
Bernie
>The graphic is pre 9/11.
>I suspect that we will see a big change in the graphic of air traffic
>when new graphics come out. Specifically, Europe to and from the US
>spending greater time over canada and cross country tracks using a
>more northern route. I wish Canada would complain about this, it
>worked for fish and water somewhat better than we were able to do on
>our own. MN needs Canada to keep Washington DC in line. We are
>obviously unable to do it ourselves as recently seen in the election.
>
>Still the far northwest corner of MN probably still does have some of
>the lowest air traffic in the country.
>
>I would agree with you that Itasca County traffic is currently high.
>I am sure that there are more people flying over Itasca county then
>are on the ground on any given day.
>
>
>Rich
>
>--- In Curt Olson <> wrote:
>> Thank you for the links to the charts. By my experience, I would
>have
>> expected them to show much more activity over far northern
>Minnesota.
>> On any given day in northwest Itasca county there will be almost
>steady
>> high-altitude air traffic.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|