Subject: | Re: Shure 183 |
---|---|
From: | Rob Danielson <> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:25:25 -0600 |
>Rob: > >Why do you say "I would not favor using MKH-20 in this regard."? > >Lang > Sorry if my remarks were confusing. So far, I've found the low end response of the R183B/CS122 in the field to be well balanced and well-defined down to 40Hz. I would not choose the MKH-20 over the 183 if low end replication was a chief goal. Both do pretty well in my estimation. Rob D. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Shure 183, ebenj |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Shure 183, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Shure 183, ebenj |
Next by Thread: | Re: Shure 183, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU