Nada, Ken. What we've got is 2-trk mono. Each year older I get, the
nightmares about this month-long session get worse. Last night, there
was a polar bear in my bedroom.
Bernie
>If I understand correctly, due to a connection problem, all you ended
>up with is a mono recording?
>
>First are you 100% sure that you have a mono track? If you just one
>channel recorded, the other blank, then yeah it's mono. If you got
>two tracks, are they 100% identical? EG if you invert one channel and
>sum the two channels do they cancel out to nothing? If there's a
>little true ambience left, there may be a way to pump up the
>separation.
>
>From all your experiments, if they didn't work, i don't think you
>will find any purely synthetic way of making this one track into
>believable stereo.
>
>Maybe you have a good stereo recording of ambience in the same
>location that could be mixed in to give the "mono" one a little life?
>
>
>
>--- In Wild Sanctuary <>
>wrote:
>> Anyone on the list know of a really convincing stereo synthesizer?
>> Long ago and far away on a recording trip to Africa, I used a MS
>> pre-amp in the field with which I was unfamiliar. The mics were
>> plugged in wrong (because I don't see very well and lost my glasses
>> and wasn't otherwise paying attention) and all I came up with was a
>> decent mono track. I've tried a number of systems to create a sense
>> of space (everything from offsetting tracks to the Orban to the
>> Quadraverb system and different combinations of all of them) but to
>> no satisfactory end.
>>
>> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677 tel
707-996-0280 FAX
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|