naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Digital stereo synth

Subject: RE: Digital stereo synth
From: Wild Sanctuary <>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:08:17 -0800
Whew! Thanks, Martyn. I'll put the canes away for a while.

BK

>Don't beat yourself up Bernie, Jesus, you've put a lot of great stuff out
>there, you are allowed some glitches, but only one more!!!!
>
>Martyn
>
>Martyn Stewart
>Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
>http://www.naturesound.org
>N47.65543   W121.98428
>Redmond. Washington. USA
>Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
>425-898-0462
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wild Sanctuary 
>Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 9:18 AM
>To: 
>Subject: [Nature Recordists] Digital stereo synth
>
>
>Mono it is. Couldn't be more so. Indelible. Etched in the digital
>media forever. Honest.
>Mono =E1 Mono. No kidding. Nothing on earth has yet been discovered to
>extract even the tiniest amt of data from what should have been a
>robust and convincing Side channel. A sad day for nature recordists -
>especially this one. Embarrassing for me, who even badly sighted
>should have heard (if I had been listening critically) the
>differences but didn't catch it for a whole month on site in an
>effort to save precious batteries by avoiding playback.
>
>Luckily, I've been to various parts of Africa many times and have
>lots of good stuff, well recorded and archived. It's just that one
>glitch...
>
>BK
>
>>I guess the only thing to do is to fly back to Africa and record mono
>>again, this time with a figure-8 mic to get the side information
>>you're missing. :P
>>
>>Can you upload a WAV sample (1 - 2 minutes) of what you've got?
>>Include both channels, unless you are 110% sure it's 2 channels of the
>>same mono.
>>
>>
>>
>>--- In  Wild Sanctuary <>
>>wrote:
>>>   Nada, Ken. What we've got is 2-trk mono. Each year older I get, the
>>>   nightmares about this month-long session get worse. Last night, there
>>>   was a polar bear in my bedroom.
>>>
>>>   Bernie
>>>
>>>   >If I understand correctly, due to a connection problem, all you ende=
d
>>>   >up with is a mono recording?
>>>   >
>>>   >First are you 100% sure that you have a mono track? If you just one
>>>   >channel recorded, the other blank, then yeah it's mono. If you got
>>>   >two tracks, are they 100% identical? EG if you invert one channel an=
d
>>>   >sum the two channels do they cancel out to nothing? If there's a
>>>   >little true ambience left, there may be a way to pump up the
>>>   >separation.
>>>   >
>>>   >From all your experiments, if they didn't work, i don't think you
>>>   >will find any purely synthetic way of making this one track into
>>>   >believable stereo.
>>>   >
>>>   >Maybe you have a good stereo recording of ambience in the same
>>>   >location that could be mixed in to give the "mono" one a little life=
?
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >--- In  Wild Sanctuary <>
>>>   >wrote:
>>>   >>  Anyone on the list know of a really convincing stereo synthesizer=
?
>>>   >>  Long ago and far away on a recording trip to Africa, I used a MS
>>>   >>  pre-amp in the field with which I was unfamiliar. The mics were
>>>   >>  plugged in wrong (because I don't see very well and lost my glass=
es
>>>   >>  and wasn't otherwise paying attention) and all I came up with was=
 a
>>>   >>  decent mono track. I've tried a number of systems to create a sen=
se
>>>   >>  of space (everything from offsetting tracks to the Orban to the
>>>   >>  Quadraverb system and different combinations of all of them) but =
to
>>>   >>  no satisfactory end.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>  Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>>>   >>
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >"Microphones are not ears,
>>>   >Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>>   >A listening room is not nature."
>>>   >Klas Strandberg
>>>   >Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>
>>>
>>>   --
>>>   Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
>>>   P. O. Box 536
>>>   Glen Ellen, CA 95442
>>>   707-996-6677 tel
>>>   707-996-0280 FAX
>>>   
>>>   http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Microphones are not ears,
>>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>  >A listening room is not nature."
>>Klas Strandberg
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
>P. O. Box 536
>Glen Ellen, CA 95442
>707-996-6677 tel
>707-996-0280 FAX
>
>http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


--

Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, California  95442-0536
Tel: (707) 996-6677
Fax: (707) 996-0280
http://www.wildsanctuary.com


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU