naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Digital stereo synth

Subject: Re: Digital stereo synth
From: Wild Sanctuary <>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:14:54 -0800
I'll check that out later today, Rob. Thanks for that suggestion.

>  >Bernie,
>>
>>Waves, I think, either have a plug-in for synthesising stereo from a mono
>>source, or a setting for their Q10 graphic EQ. Either way, what it does is
>>split the frequency bands of the sound between 2 channels (ie band 1 to
>>left, band 2 to right, etc).
>>
>>Have you tried this technique? I've never experimented but would expect this
>>to generate an illusion of space in the recording at the expense of audio
>>fidelity - which may or may not sound OK. Might work for an installation
>>where the 'feel' is more important than absolute frequency integrity.
>>
>>Geoff.
>>
>
>A home-patched, more sound-specific variation of the Wave's eq based
>synthesis that sometimes works pretty well is to create eq that
>"dries up" or reduces the prominance of the most resonate frequencies
>in the original mono track. This takes some careful listening and a
>multi-band parametric eq plug like Eqium.  Place this eq on the
>channel that one wishes to render in the stereo field as closer.
>Place the original on the other channel and insert sample delay and
>eq. Play with both variables to create a stereo field. The volume of
>the original (more resonant) side usually needs to be lower because
>its placed further away with this technique.  Use hard pans only. If
>this field lacks luster, a tricker technique is to phase cancel sum
>these two channels and bus this sum with its own eq and very modest
>space-appropriate reverb to the center. This last step can create
>some oddities that require filtering but if you are patient in
>removing them with eq, it can add "depth" that is more spatially
>defined than reverb alone. I've also used Tom Erbe's plug that Mark
>suggested to create a mono sum for the center inserted with eq and
>mild reverb. If  the stereo file is headed for broadcast, its
>probably a good idea to insert Waves S1 at the output stage. S1 uses
>m-s processing and will usually make it mono compatible. I haven't
>tried it, but if you put S1 in the chain from the start, you could
>tweak it too as you proceed with the other adjustments. I'd up
>everything to 24 bit at the outset. Rob D.
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 

Wild Sanctuary, Inc.
P. O. Box 536
Glen Ellen, California  95442-0536
Tel: (707) 996-6677
Fax: (707) 996-0280
http://www.wildsanctuary.com


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU