If I understand correctly, due to a connection problem, all you ended
up with is a mono recording?
First are you 100% sure that you have a mono track? If you just one
channel recorded, the other blank, then yeah it's mono. If you got
two tracks, are they 100% identical? EG if you invert one channel and
sum the two channels do they cancel out to nothing? If there's a
little true ambience left, there may be a way to pump up the
separation.
>From all your experiments, if they didn't work, i don't think you
will find any purely synthetic way of making this one track into
believable stereo.
Maybe you have a good stereo recording of ambience in the same
location that could be mixed in to give the "mono" one a little life?
--- In Wild Sanctuary <>
wrote:
> Anyone on the list know of a really convincing stereo synthesizer?
> Long ago and far away on a recording trip to Africa, I used a MS
> pre-amp in the field with which I was unfamiliar. The mics were
> plugged in wrong (because I don't see very well and lost my glasses
> and wasn't otherwise paying attention) and all I came up with was a
> decent mono track. I've tried a number of systems to create a sense
> of space (everything from offsetting tracks to the Orban to the
> Quadraverb system and different combinations of all of them) but to
> no satisfactory end.
>
> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|