Why don't you think so? Without barriers, won't the four speakers all be
interacting with one another and creating lots of phasing problems?
>Yes, that is exactly what I'm thinking of, but with slightly extended
>barriers. The SASS nose works fine when just two channels (and two speakers)
>are involved. A more substantial barrier seems necessary with the
>introduction of two more channels and speakers.
I don't think so.
-Dan
>Lang
>
>Lang Elliott, you wrote,
>
>>I have been envisioning a quad setup that really does produce a realistic
>>360 degree soundscape, allowing the listener to actually turn in any
>>direction and still hear a stable soundfield. This can only be accomplished
>>if there are adequate barriers between not only the front and rear channels,
>>but also between the right side pair and the left side pair. In other words,
>>there actually would be no "front" or "rear" defined in this kind of setup.
>>"Front" would be the direction that one faces.
>
>I agree. Your SASS mikes have a "nose" barrier that separates left
>and right. How about building a "quad SASS" with four noses?
>
>-Dan Dugan
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<=Unsubscribe>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|