Subject: | RE: Sample Rate Conversion |
---|---|
From: | "Michael McInnis" <> |
Date: | Tue, 11 May 2004 21:00:16 -0400 |
Yeah...what was I thinking? My software, the little known Saw Studio, does realtime sample rate conversion, so I can use this method for comparison purposes on the different settings within the one program...unfortunately, this doesn't wor= k for the task at hand. What one could find out is how damaging the round trip would be...48k to 44= k to 48k again. It might help in evaluating where each software is "putting" the errors. This might have some meaning for software only conversions. Thanks Walt for pointing out my poor logic. Regards, MM Michael McInnis Productions http://www.mm-pro.com -----Original Message----- From: Walter Knapp Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:52 PM To: Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Sample Rate Conversion ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sample Rate Conversion, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU