naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Minidisk data transfer and bat recordings

Subject: RE: Minidisk data transfer and bat recordings
From: "Martyn Stewart" <>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 03:30:52 -0800
Absolutely no need to apologize Andy, I take your point and applaud you wit=
h
it, I love technology too and at times my passion for new things gets me
into trouble with the missus! we cannot stand still, and I agree with your
principle, I would have died if man would have stopped at the moon and not
gone on to Mars same as I would have been totally unsatisfied had we stayed
with analogue and not progressed to digital, but as I said, sometimes this
group gets too wrapped in the latest recorder and becomes a spring board fo=
r
retailers to advertise their product leaving a lot of us chasing things tha=
t
sometimes are not as good as what we already have.

Britney Spears, where the bloody hell did I pull her from!!!!!!!!!



Regards



Martyn

http://www.naturesound.org <http://www.naturesound.org/>





  _____=20

From: Andrew Lackey 
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:12 PM
To: Nature Recordist
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Minidisk data transfer and bat recordings



> Martyn,
>
> I realize now that I came off stiff in the my first email.  I certainly
meant
> no direct insult just as I=B9m sure you meant no direct insult to those y=
ou
> disagree with.  Please accept my apologies.
>
> Your point of Beatle vs. Brittany Spears is well taken.
>
> But allow me to use the Beatles as an example of my point as well. George
> Martin=B9s Beatles recordings were the very essence of innovation both in
> creativity and technology.  So extraordinary in fact that they are
marveled at
> today and will be forever.  Not because we can put these on a scope and
admire
> their impressive frequency response, but because a group of guys got
together
> had the guts to dream the unimaginable and the ingenuity to bring it to
> fruition.
>
> We are all pursuing our personal sonic endevaors to different ends.  I
imagine
> some of us don=B9t know our end, but we love the journey just the same.
I=B9ll
> speak for myself when I say that I thrive on the cycle...creativity feeds
> technology which feeds creativity which feeds technology.  I guess anothe=
r
way
> to put it is...If you are already doing incredible work in a certain
> creative/technological (or as we have termed: good enough) phase then wha=
t
is
> there to stimulate my sense of accomplishment or adventure or innovation
or
> whatever you want to call it in sound.  I would much rather appreciate
your
> fine work, use it as influence and forge my own path.
>
> This is really what I meant to say in my initial post, and again my
apologies!
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> I have equipment value here in my studio totaling about $60.000 including
> mics, does this make my equipment average? you equate Good enough with
poor
> quality, sure go out and chase the best (as they say) for the next
> generation of tools but in the meantime, you tell me what is different to
> the human ear and what we can perceive!
>
> Are the old recordings of say the Beatles any worse than say Britney
Spears?
> Listen to these on an FM radio and I=92m afraid the comments come over as
this
> is musical garbage, not the quality of the recording. I used to go and ge=
t
> what was put to me as the latest recorder and in the end find it was just
as
> good as what I had already got most of the time now, I go out with my
Sharp
> MD-DR7, I have recording samples all over the world and on various
> compellations, its as good as it gets.
>
>=20
>
> < I find it truly ironic that this post has the heading =B3MiniDisk data
> transfer
>> > and bat recordings=B2>
>
>=20
>
> I hit the reply button; I wasn=92t looking at the title of the string!!
>
>=20
>
> *       If good enough is good enough, then fine for you, but leave the
> people who
>> > want and need
>> > newer and better tools alone to accomplish their works.>
>
>=20
>
> I would never stop them chasing their goal but it gets a bit boring when
all
> that you want to talk about is the very latest recorder and bit rates, it
> seems that this group at times is an advertisement board for retailers.
>
>=20
>
> Martyn
>
>=20
>
> http://www.naturesound.org <http://www.naturesound.org/>
>
>=20
>
>=20
>
>=20
>
>   _____=20
>
> From: Andrew Lackey 
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:46 PM
> To: Nature Recordist
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Minidisk data transfer and bat recording=
s
>
>=20
>
>> > This topic bubbles up everyone once in a while in my circles....and I
say
>> > NEVER
>> > turn your back on technology.  Master the techniques and the tools, an=
d
>> > eventually
>> > the creativity and innovation in your works will help shape the next
>> > generation of tools.
>> > Its the cycle of human accomplish from fire to the wheel to the
printing
> press
>> > to the...
>> >
>> > If good enough is good enough, then fine for you, but leave the people
who
>> > want and need
>> > newer and better tools alone to accomplish their works.
>> >
>> > I find it truly ironic that this post has the heading =B3MiniDisk data
> transfer
>> > and bat recordings=B2
>> >
>> > It=B9s been reported that bats make sound well over 120khz.  And since
you
> need
>> > twice the sample
>> > rate to capture a frequency....then, oh damn, 192k sample rate only
gets
> us up
>> > to 96k.  I guess we=B9ll
>> > have to wait until the next generation of records to truly capture
those
>> > =B3nature sounds=B2. I guess 192 will do
>> > for now.
>> >
>> > a different view
>> > andy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Walt you say
>> >
>> > <I work on the concept of "good enough". It's all fine and dandy to
waste
>> > lots of money chasing perfect if it amuses you, but what really counts
>> > is "good enough". If it will get the job done well, why spend extra?
>> >
>> > This seems to be something that is all too frequently ignored. People
>> > agonize over fluff and trivia. Make huge tempests in teapots. They
spend
>> > huge sums of money on it. And they try to drag others into the game.
>> > It's well worth being practical and asking what level is "good enough"=
>
>> >
>> >=20
>> >
>> > This is something that hits close to the heart with me Walt. So many
> people
>> > in this group worry about the latest recorder and what it can do that
the
>> > other can't, blah, blah blah.. The thing is, what you already have is
> often
>> > good enough! To find a recorder better than say a Portadisk would be
very
>> > hard indeed, and if you have one, why bother about going out to buy
>> > something else untried and tested to give results that nobody in the
group
>> > really hear!
>> >
>> > Apart from the very few, nobody really posts any good recording sound
> bytes,
>> > I try to put up as many examples as I can but as far as a group goes,
> apart
>> > from maybe 4 or 5 people here, do you really record nature sounds or
are
> you
>> > to wrapped in the latest technology?
>> >
>> > I have maybe 4 or 5 very decent recorders and each one is as capable o=
f
>> > delivering a good recording. Why bother in getting a new $2000
recorder?
>> >
>> > Challenge to the group.
>> >
>> >=20
>> >
>> > Lets hear what you have and let others listen to what is already out
> there.
>> >
>> > Now, if you want to talk about mics, then that is a different question=
!
>> >
>> >=20
>> >
>> >   _____=20
>> >
>> > From: Walter Knapp 
>> > Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 3:50 PM
>> > To: 
>> > Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Minidisk data transfer and bat
recordings
>> >
>> >=20
>> >
>> > From: "Graham M Smith" <>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Bruce,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> Short answer: the quality of the analog section and the
>>>>>>>> accuracy of
> the
>>>>>>>> >>>> >>> digital one.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > So I might get away with the lower cost option for what I am
doing. It
>>>> >> > certainly seems worth trying out a couple of options before
deciding
> which
>>>> >> > to use. Bearing in mind that I am going to need up to 20 of them.
>> >
>> > I work on the concept of "good enough". It's all fine and dandy to
waste
>> > lots of money chasing perfect if it amuses you, but what really counts
>> > is "good enough". If it will get the job done well, why spend extra?
>> >
>> > This seems to be something that is all too frequently ignored. People
>> > agonize over fluff and trivia. Make huge tempests in teapots. They
spend
>> > huge sums of money on it. And they try to drag others into the game.
>> > It's well worth being practical and asking what level is "good enough"
>> >
>> > In recording perfect is unobtainable, in fact compared to the original
>> > sound at the mic the very best is very crude. And each person's opinio=
n
>> > about what they hear if at the mic location would be different. I work
>> > on "good enough".
>> >
>> > Think about all the folks making that so called perfect recording. Jus=
t
>> > so someone can play it on a boombox with speakers half dead from being
>> > played too loud. Or $5 headphones. Or make a crude sonogram of it. Or
>> > play it on what passes for a good home stereo these days. "good enough=
"
>> > for your audience has a certain meaning.
>> >
>> > Now, I've found that my "good enough" or "barely acceptable" magically
>> > turns into things like "excellent" when handed off to the listeners.
>> > Should I spend the money or time to get it to where I call it
>> > "excellent"? Something I'll probably never do about my stuff no matter
>> > how much I like it.
>> >
>> > This is particularly true in science, where funds are always limited.
>> > "good enough" is what you are after. At least according to this
scientist.
>> >
>> > Walt
>> > 
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >   _____=20
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> > *      To visit your group on the web, go to:
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
>> >=20=20
>> > *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > 
>> >
<=3DUnsubscribe>
>> >=20=20
>> > *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>> > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
>> > *=20
>> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > * 
>> >
<=3DUnsubscribe>
>> > *=20
>> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
>> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>   _____=20
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> *      To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
>=20=20
> *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 
> <=3DUnsubscrib=
e>
>=20=20
> *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
> *=20
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> * 
> <=3DUnsubscrib=
e>
> *=20
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



ADVERTISEMENT

<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=3D12c8a9j3p/M=3D267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=
=3Degroup
web/S=3D1705083663:HM/EXP=3D1075187567/A=3D1945638/R=3D0/*http:/www.netflix=
.com/Defa
ult?mqso=3D60178383&partid=3D4116730> click here



<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=3D267637.4116730.5333196.1261774/D=3Degro=
upmai
l/S=3D:HM/A=3D1945638/rand=3D238464136>



  _____=20

Yahoo! Groups Links

*       To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
=20
*       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<=3DUnsubscribe>=

=20
*       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________




------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU