naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ultrasoundgate mic preamp

Subject: Re: ultrasoundgate mic preamp
From: "Rich Peet" <>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 02:24:59 -0000
I for one do care if there is a business interest in the posts on
this group.  Which probably does not apply here but sure does on
other posts.  We have been well represented by commercial people here
and I welcome it.  We have seen manufacturer responses and
consideration to our ideas beyond what I have seen on any other
listserv. I hope the concept grows where we continue to be among the
first to know about new developements and what others think works
well.

Let me know if there is a resistance to commercial interests as I
will wish to be on the recycle of a dozen MKH-110's sometime in the
next couple years. If I shouldn't say first here that they are
available than I won't.  Another topic for faq.

And where else could I learn that my 50 hours of mourning dove
recordings are in demand by someone? :) Just joking, but obtainable
if someone really wants.

Rich Peet

--- In  "Raimund Specht"
<> wrote:
> --- In  "Martyn Stewart"
> <> wrote:
> > The picturebook computer is around $1900 to $2000, I have a Sony
> > picturebook PCG-C1MW running a Crusoe processor and once you have
> > bought the Ultrasoundgate with it, adds up to a lot of money for
a
> > system that is as good as a portadisk or Marantz flashcard
> > player?!!, you only have one mic input too?  I think its a lot of
> > equipment also to cart around in the field, the picture looks
like
> a
> > lot of finicky bits & Pieces, Sounds like your an agent for the
> > bloke too, how much commission you on?
> >
> > Martyn
>
> First, I can assure, that this "bloke" does not pay any commission
> to anyone...
>
> Second, these devices do not claim to replace the PortaDisk or
> Marantz devices. There is no doubt, that these portable recorders
> are easier to handle than a computer in conjunction with an USB
> audio interface. However, if you need higher sampling rates (e.g.
> for recording grasshoppers or bats) or higher dynamic ranges, the
> UltraSoundGate devices will be appropriate. Do you know another
> compact and portable solution to exploit the extended frequency
> range of a MKH800?
>
> Raimund



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU