birding-aus

Another bivalve victim

To: Peter Shute <>
Subject: Another bivalve victim
From: Allan Richardson <>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:05:29 +1100
While it is true that banding has been undertaken for many years, there still 
remains many questions that only banding can answer - for instance local 
movements within estuaries after birds have settled into the summer or winter 
estuary of their choice.

We all know our estuaries are constantly under development pressure and key to 
being able to make strong cases for bird conservation is knowing how they use a 
specific estuary and what areas are important to them. Banding can play an 
important role in identifying where cohorts within an estuary's migratory flock 
go, or if some birds are outside current niche knowledge and require additional 
survey work find unknown roosting or foraging sites.

The other point perhaps that should be made about the long-term nature of 
banding studies is that, due to pressures coming to bear across borders 
throughout the flyway, the niches of the birds are constantly changing. We all 
know the pressures birds are forced to bear: due to outright loss of habitat, 
increased habitat pressure from human activities, climate change affecting prey 
species and a whole host of other pressures that are pertinent to specific 
habitat areas and/or others that we may not know about yet.

In a changing world banding and radio-tracking work, are some of the techniques 
that allow us to keep our finger on the pulse of how pressure on bird habitat 
is changing their movements, affecting their weight (a measure of habitat 
quality declines in some cases), longevity, fecundity and of course reactions 
to stochastic events - to name only a small amount of the data that can only be 
sourced by capturing and recapturing birds.

It is not perfect I agree, we would all love to be able to just watch birds and 
not lay a hand on them, but managing populations is hard enough with the 
relatively small amounts of data that are coming through from banding (only a 
small percentage of the birds we see in the Hunter estuary have bands 
attached). Can we really manage and conserve without well thought out and 
specifically targeted information sets that only banding can give us?

Allan Richardson
Morisset NSW
 
On 24/02/2013, at 2:52 PM, Peter Shute wrote:

> I don't think anyone has ever claimed that banding will itself halt any 
> declines. I was under the impression it was about proving that there is a 
> decline and where the birds routes and feeding grounds are.
> 
> Could anyone ever claim that a particular wetland deserves protection if they 
> had no idea what effect its availability has on any species? Perhaps things 
> would be far worse than they are without the data we have.
> 
> Peter Shute
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU