Hi --
--- In "" <> wrote:
>
> --- In "zuikway" <tech2@> wrote:
> >
> > Simply because the 7800 runs 2.6 out of the box, I would recommend it. The
> > main advantage of the ts-7300 is the second ethernet port, but it is an
> > older board and only 2.4 is supported.
> >
> > WayneS
>
> Right, but if I can't get the FPGA to work with my own verilog designs, the
> 7800 isn't much use to me. I can't see a 500MHz ARM chip being able to
> sustain video-rate JPEG compression without some extra grunt from the FPGA...
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
Please take a look at this thread & wiki that's referred to:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/message/14172
I'd have to agree with Wayne: even if you don't need the additional power of
the marvel chip (yet), you should consider it:
* ARMv5t compared to ARMv4t
* Well supported by debian EABI
* Better support in general linux community for 2.6 vs 2.4, esp wrt kernel
modules
Of course you could use a 2.6 kernel & EABI rootfs with the TS-7300, but that
may not be how you want to spend thanksgiving :)
regards, ........ Charlie
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|