ts-7000
[Top] [All Lists]

[ts-7000] Re: ts-7800/ts-7300 and the FPGA

To:
Subject: [ts-7000] Re: ts-7800/ts-7300 and the FPGA
From: "zuikway" <>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:32:14 -0000
Simply because the 7800 runs 2.6 out of the box, I would recommend it. The main 
advantage of the ts-7300 is the second ethernet port, but it is an older board 
and only 2.4 is supported.

WayneS

--- In  "" <> wrote:
>
> I'm on the verge of purchasing one of these two boards, and I'm trying to 
> make up my mind. 
> 
> On the one hand, the extra CPU MHz on the 7800 might come in handy - the plan 
> is to digitise incoming video to JPEG frames, and send them over the wire and 
> I doubt either board will have enough FPGA space to do a full video-rate JPEG 
> encode, so it's going to be a co-design with the ARM doing some of the work 
> and the FPGA doing the heavy lifting with the DCT and maybe the 
> zig-zag/Huffman encoding.
> 
> On the other hand, the 7300 FPGA is supported, and I'm not sure how stable / 
> future-proof the 7800 user-programming procedure is that I've read about. 
> 
> I had a few questions to figure out whether the 7800 will do for me. I'd 
> greatly appreciate any feedback :)
> 
>   - On the 7800 board, the FPGA is a Lattice ECP2-12 device, right ? I've 
> never used one of these before, but 
> http://www.wikifpga.com/index.php?title=Performance_Analysis puts it as 
> generally faster than a Spartan-3, though that chart compares an S3 at grade 
> -4 vs the ECP2 at grade -5.
> 
>  - To that point, do we know what speed-grade is used on the board ?
> 
>  - Is the ECP2 used on the board programmable using the downloadable tools 
> from Lattice ? Reading the lattice website, it appears the ECP2 is, but the 
> ECP2M/S is not. I'm not sure what the difference is between the ECP2 and 
> ECP2M/S parts... If I have to spend $1500 on software, my decision is made 
> for me :)
> 
>  - What's the delivery turnaround time from Techologic like ? I have 
> Thanksgiving week off :)
> 
>  - Lastly, I take it that there still isn't any strategic decision to 
> officially support the 7800 as a user-programmable target by Technologic 
> systems ?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help :)
> 
> Simon
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

Disclaimer: Neither Andrew Taylor nor the University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering take any responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU