I'm surprised that no one has mentioned "Twisted Wave" - that's my favorite
destructive two track editor. No spectral editing, but it's a great
program. Simple, lightweight, yet full featured. Excellent customer service
as well. Highly recommended.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018, 10:55 PM
[naturerecordists] <
wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Paul. The WSRS results really surprise me. I just had a look
> at Reaper, it seems WAY too complex for traditional wildlife sound audio
> editing, and with such a frustratingly complex interface. Inexpensive
> though. Audacity, with its clunky too-busy tools window, no I don=92t li=
ke
> it either (even tho its free).
>
> Aesthetically and practically Sound Studio 4 is now my preferred choice
> for basic stereo editing, you can custom design your colour scheme which
> does make a big difference, to me at any rate. I have found a darker blu=
e
> background with lighter turquoise waveform is restful on the eyes when yo=
u
> are processing for many hours. The tools window of Sound Studio is very
> elegant, only the essentials are on show. Short cuts work in a similar w=
ay
> to Peak, so I feel right at home here. And I can now use my favourite EQ
> plug-in apQualzr2 with Sound Studio.
>
> Raven - I downloaded the Lite version but it would not install. Can=92t =
be
> bothered with it. Amadeus is better for sonograms in any case, in my
> opinion.
>
> It=92s probably time we did another survey for our Australian Wildlife So=
und
> Recording Group. I know Adobe Audition, Pro Tools, Izotope RX and Peak
> were the Oz favourites a few years back.
>
> Vicki
> (Former sound editor for AWSRG)
>
>
> On 2 Dec 2018, at 10:17 pm, [naturerecordists] <
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Vicki
> In a recent survey of Wildlife Sound Recording Society members, Audacity
> and Reaper were the most popular applications. (Wildlife Sound Journal Vo=
l
> 14 No.3). Personally I use Amadeus and Reaper, then iZotope RX for noise
> reduction.
>
> Paul
>
> WSRS web officer
>
>
>
>
>
>
|