| Subject: | Re: Question about 44.1 vs 96 kHz |
|---|---|
| From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
| Date: | Mon Jun 1, 2015 9:01 am ((PDT)) |
" There's also a bit of natural dynamic range compression with 24 bit (when= converted to 16 bit). " There is dynamic range loss, but not compression, when converting from 24bi= t to 16bit. SF |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question about 44.1 vs 96 kHz, brini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question about 44.1 vs 96 kHz, James Shatto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about 44.1 vs 96 kHz, brini |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question about 44.1 vs 96 kHz, James Shatto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU