73dfda
Date: Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:15 am ((PDT))
Thanks, I will go for the original set up. I just needed someone to confirm
it ;)
2013/10/23 Tom Williams <>
> **
>
>
> Johan,
>
> In my opinion you should stick with the PMD-661 and the NT1A. The NT1As
> will need a bit of extra work - you'll have to construct a stereo mountin=
g
> and a good windshield as they are very sensitive to wind noise - but for
> recording general soundscapes they will deliver stereo imaging and low
> self-noise way beyond the other options that have been suggested to you. =
I
> suspect most retailers have very limited experience with nature recording
> and soundscape recording in particular.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 23 October 2013 15:13, <> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Hello again.
>>
>> I just got a call from another retailer and he recomended a NT4 for
>> stereo recording, saying that the NT1-a probally wasnt the best choice f=
or
>> nature recordings, due to the sensitivity and the short range of recordi=
ng.
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> ---In <> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I ordered a Marantz PMD 661 MKII the other day which I was going to use
>> with two R=F6de NT1-a for recordings. Today I called a shop for opinions=
but
>> they instead recomended a Zoom H6 and use the internal mic with a R=F6de
>> NT55. I've done a lot of reading these past days and I'm not sure I will=
be
>> happy with that set, though I have not seen many reviews or thougths abo=
ut
>> the Zoom H6.
>>
>>
>> I have no experience at all with recording but I've found some great
>> setups using the NT1-a. In time I will buy a Telinga mic for more direct
>> sound but at the moment I want to record the nature as a whole.
>>
>>
>> So, what do you think? Should I return the Marantz and replace it with H=
6
>> using the NT55 or should I go for what I first was going to, the PMD 661
>> with a pair of NT1-a?
>>
>>
>> Thanks. Johan.
>>
>>
>
>
--
Med v=E4nlig h=E4lsning, Johan.
Best Regards, Johan.
|