I can understand how the table could increase the signal, but not how it co=
uld increase the separation. If it works then I'd consider mounting my reco=
rder on a board instead of lugging a SASS style rig around. It's not the we=
ight of it that's the problem, but the size - I can just barely squeeze it =
into my backpack.
Peter Shute
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> On Behalf Of Philip Tyler
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2013 8:47 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] What has the lowest Noise
> Floor for an all in one recorder?
>
>
>
> Yes, it was by pure accident as I just put it on a table to
> record and listening to it thought it sounded much better.
> Still experimenting with it at the moment.
>
> Phil
>
> On 21 Oct 2013, at 22:16, Peter Shute <> wrote:
>
>
>
>=20=09
>
> Could you elaborate on this please, Philip? Do you mean
> placing it on a hard surface?
>=20=09
> Peter Shute
>=20=09
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > On Behalf
> Of Philip Tyler
> > Sent: Monday, 21 October 2013 11:48 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] What has the lowest Noise
> > Floor for an all in one recorder?
> >
> >
> >
> > In 'fee air' I would agree the Sony PCM-M10's stereo is not
> > great, but if you can sit it on something so the mics work as
> > a boundary microphone I have found the stereo to be
> somewhat better.
|