| Subject: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM |
|---|---|
| From: | "Robin" robin_parmar_sound |
| Date: | Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:13 pm ((PDT)) |
David Brinicombe wrote: > At 96 Kb/s, I reckon most music is OK, but > random sounds are getting tinkly. Except in special cases I can't bear music recorded at less than 192kbps. 1= 28kbps is noticeably poor to me a significant amount of the time, without b= enefit to comparison streams. I am disappointed in SoundCloud for that reas= on, but understand the constraints. I always encode at 320kbps when I must use MP3. -- Robin Parmar |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, Robin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, brini |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, Robin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Digital Compression - was New SSM, brini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU