| Subject: | Re: Tascam DR680 + 2 Audio Technica AT4022 Omnidirectional Condenser |
|---|---|
| From: | "Eric Benjamin" ericbenjamin2 |
| Date: | Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:08 pm ((PDT)) |
Microphones that run on phantom power do require more power than PIP microphones. If, for example, the microphone requires 1 mA, which would be= on the high side for a PIP microphone but on the low side for a phantom powere= d microphone, then the PIP mic would be taking 3 milliWatts and the phantom powered microphone would be taking 48 mW. Given that a more typical curren= t consumption for PIP is 0.5 mA and 3-4 mA for phantom powered, then it is no= t at all surprising that using phantom power really sucks down the batteries! Perhaps I should design a very low current phantom powered microphone for portable use. Eric Benjamin |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tascam DR680 + 2 Audio Technica AT4022 Omnidirectional Condenser, Peter Shute |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: Tascam DR680 + 2 Audio Technica AT4022=, Peter Shute |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR680 + 2 Audio Technica AT4022 Omnidirectional Condenser, Peter Shute |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR680 + 2 Audio Technica AT4022 Omnidirectional Condenser, brini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU