Subject: | Re: Zoom H2n opinions please |
---|---|
From: | "Jez" tempjez |
Date: | Tue Jun 4, 2013 1:59 pm ((PDT)) |
I know some folks will be ok with it but, as with zoom in general, the cons= truction is a bit iffy - very plastic indeed - + the pre-amps are noisy & t= he mics themselves aren't that good. Whenever we do group mic tests on work= shops - all set up in a semi-circle recording at the same time etc. the zoo= m's can always be spotted when we playback the recordings without telling f= olks which is which. They're thin & brittle sounding. --- In "lamprophis1963" <> wro= te: > > > http://www.zoom.co.jp/news/article/548 > > That is certainly an intriguing looking piece of equipment. Particularly= for US$399 with the MS and XY microphone attachments included. > > It ain't pretty, but I record after dark anyway (frogs). > > Chris > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Zoom H2n opinions please, lamprophis1963 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Zoom H2n opinions please, Peter Shute |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Zoom H2n opinions please, lamprophis1963 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Zoom H2n opinions please, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU