[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Zoom H2n opinions please

Subject: Re: Zoom H2n opinions please
From: "Robin" robin_parmar_sound
Date: Tue Jun 4, 2013 3:38 pm ((PDT))
Jez wrote:

> I know some folks will be ok with it but, as with zoom in general, the co=
nstruction is a bit iffy - very plastic indeed - + the pre-amps are noisy &=
 the mics themselves aren't that good. Whenever we do group mic tests on wo=
rkshops - all set up in a semi-circle recording at the same time etc. the z=
oom's can always be spotted when we playback the recordings without telling=
 folks which is which. They're thin & brittle sounding.

Agreed. I have been in situations where person A is showing off a Zoom to p=
erson B and B is loving it, ready to run out and buy one.

There's no convincing people there are better options. Being popular helps =
make a device even more popular. Same as with many things.

-- Robin Parmar

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU