Re: Sound Editing Software

Subject:	Re: Sound Editing Software
From:	"NICK DANDO" =

ld.com
Date: Fri May 31, 2013 8:28 am ((PDT))

That's good to know. I hadn't looked at Audacity for a few years, being hap=
py with Soundtrack Pro. I'll have to give it another go to see if it's easi=
er than the somewhat baffling Reaper.

Nick


From: Peter Shute <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013, 21:24
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Sound Editing Software



=C2=A0
On 31/05/2013, at 4:37 AM, "Nick Dando" <<mailto:=
>> wrote:

Alternatives are Reaper, which is cheap, and Audacity, which is free, but d=
oesn't have the ability to deal with 24/192 recordings.

Is that correct? A quick Google search says it's been able to handle 192kHz=
 recordings since at least 2011. (See http://forum.audacityteam.org/viewtop=
ic.php?f=3D16&t=3D61803)

Peter Shute

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Sound Editing Software, NICK DANDO <= Re: Sound Editing Software, Jez Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute Re: Sound Editing Software, umashankar Re: Sound Editing Software, Jez Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute Re: Sound Editing Software, NICK DANDO Re: Sound Editing Software, Peter Shute Re: Sound Editing Software, NICK DANDO Re: Sound Editing Software, NICK DANDO

Previous by Date:	Re: headphones for use on field, Max Catterwell
Next by Date:	Telinga Tripod Mount, Dan Rossi
Previous by Thread:	Re: headphones for use on field, Klas Strandberg
Next by Thread:	Re: Sound Editing Software, Jez
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU