[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound Editing Software

Subject: Re: Sound Editing Software
From: "NICK DANDO" =
Date: Fri May 31, 2013 8:28 am ((PDT))

That's good to know. I hadn't looked at Audacity for a few years, being hap=
py with Soundtrack Pro. I'll have to give it another go to see if it's easi=
er than the somewhat baffling Reaper.


From: Peter Shute <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013, 21:24
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Sound Editing Software

On 31/05/2013, at 4:37 AM, "Nick Dando" <<mailto:=
>> wrote:

Alternatives are Reaper, which is cheap, and Audacity, which is free, but d=
oesn't have the ability to deal with 24/192 recordings.

Is that correct? A quick Google search says it's been able to handle 192kHz=
 recordings since at least 2011. (See

Peter Shute

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU