[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sound Editing Software

Subject: Re: Sound Editing Software
From: "Jez" tempjez
Date: Sat Jun 1, 2013 7:46 am ((PDT))
Reaper is one of the best suites around - the paths & processing software i=
s top level & unlike Audacity, it's built & maintained by folks who are com=
mitted to providing a very high level service. Audacity is 'ok' but the fac=
t that you can't monitor while making adjustments (if you do that with your=
 recordings) is a major & bizarre, problem.

Reaper is actually really easy to use once when gets past the basics & ther=
e are lots of video's online showing basic set up of tracks etc.

--- In  NICK DANDO <> wrote:
> That's good to know. I hadn't looked at Audacity for a few years, being h=
appy with Soundtrack Pro. I'll have to give it another go to see if it's ea=
sier than the somewhat baffling Reaper.
> Nick
> ________________________________
>  From: Peter Shute <>
> To: "" <>=

> Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013, 21:24
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Sound Editing Software
> =C2=A0
> On 31/05/2013, at 4:37 AM, "Nick Dando" <<nick.dando=
@...>> wrote:
> Alternatives are Reaper, which is cheap, and Audacity, which is free, but=
 doesn't have the ability to deal with 24/192 recordings.
> Is that correct? A quick Google search says it's been able to handle 192k=
Hz recordings since at least 2011. (See
> Peter Shute

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU