I agree, it's a little out of synch. The full speed version might be too, but
it moves so fast it's hard to be sure.
Chris, how do you get your spectrograms so clean? Is that the results of them
being cleaned up somehow, or is it because the recordings are clean? Mine are
from a SASS style array, so there's lots of background noise making the
spectrograms speckly.
Peter Shute
From: On
Behalf Of vickipowys
Sent: Monday, 14 January 2013 7:11 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: More on scrolling spectrograms
What a lovely website Chris!
I had a quick look & listen to 2 species with sonograms, your system
seems to work well. But for the Skylark at one-fifth speed the
sonogram started to lag behind towards the end. Not a criticism,
just an observation on the technologies we are discussing.
Vicki
On 13/01/2013, at 10:56 PM, chrishails50 wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I use Raven software to make a spectrogram and then Camtasia Studio
> as a screen capture package. I don't scroll them as it takes longer
> to load but I play samples. Lots of examples here:
>
> http://www.wildechoes.org<http://www.wildechoes.org/>
>
> No problems with jerkiness if the file is small, some problem with
> very high frequencies and Camtasia.
>
> Chris
>
> --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Peter Shute wrote:
>>
>> It's about a year since I asked here about methods of producing
>> scrolling spectrogram movies for Youtube. At the time, the only
>> solutions I was offered were to use screen capture software to
>> capture the display of an audio program like Audacity, etc, or
>> Acousmographe, which can produce a Flash movie.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
|