naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: iRig pre

Subject: 3. Re: iRig pre
From: "Raimund" animalsounds
Date: Sun Jan 6, 2013 9:52 am ((PST))
> I don't think that this is going to be a problem in any of these devices, 
> because their balanced output signals have already been amplified at this 
> point. A drop of 6 dB would therefore not make a difference in terms of noise 
> (one can easily compensate for that by increasing the gain of the preamp or 
> the recorder).

John, 

I just realized that my previous reply was not correct (it is really a complex 
issue ;-). 

Taking only one of the two (amplified) balanced output rails could still lead 
to a degradation of the noise performance. So, I believe that feeding the 
difference of the two into the unbanlanced input would be better in terms of 
noise. I seems to me however that this kind of "unbalancing" is not available 
on the SoundDevices preamps. 

One thing that one might try is to connect the unbalanced line input of the 
recorder to the XLR pins 2 and 3 of the preamp output (rather than to ground 
and pin 2 or 3). Such a floating arrangement might work if at least one of the 
units (either the preamp or the recorder) is battery powered. That way, one 
would just record the difference between the two rails. But I have never tried 
that and I'm not sure if it really works in practice...

Regards,
Raimund







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU