naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?

Subject: Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?
From: "Robin" robin_parmar_sound
Date: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:04 pm ((PST))
Klas Strandberg wrote:

> But what kind of respect will "a
> future" pay to that engagement, when "everybody"
> will think that the red on the ice is
> not at all blood from the seal puppets, but paint?
>
> Isn't that a problem?

This is only a problem if you make decisions based on your legacy. But sinc=
e changing standards can never be predicted, I think it's a mistake to let =
this generate angst.

The solution is to make decisions based on the constraints of the present, =
the goals you wish to attain in the tangible future, and other factors that=
 are not completely unforeseen.

We are not responsible for those things we cannot control.

Besides which, I do not share your negative view of declining standards. Pe=
ople have always thought they lived in those times when things were getting=
 worse. Right back to the earliest documents we can find! It's human nature=
 but does not reflect any underlying reality. Certainly the potential for a=
udio recording quality has only increased in my lifetime. As has the genera=
l level of knowledge and interest in field recording.

-- Robin Parmar







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU