naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Simultaneous recording with two digital recorders?

Subject: Re: Simultaneous recording with two digital recorders?
From: "soundings23" soundings23
Date: Fri Jun 8, 2012 1:17 pm ((PDT))
Thanks Jez, I have different machines - so I'll see if Sony and Edirol are in 
the same time world soon :) The thing I like already about the cheap Sony PCM 
M10 I picked up today is that it has a 5s record buffer. A very very neat 
thing. I also like the fact it has a rotary dial for manual record gain. Simple 
things. 

cheers

T

--- In  "Jez" <> wrote:
>
> no - not once have I ever had issues with that & some of the recordings have 
> been hours & hours. I've been looking into the latency issue recently & i'm 
> not convinced by some of the stories that go round. For a start the main 
> latency issue is often in monitoring & so isn't on the recording so to speak. 
> I've also discovered (which is often the case) that latency stats on some 
> recorders & indeed on the digital recording process are simply there, as with 
> a ,ot of things these days, to protect the manufacturers ie. so they're 
> covered in case of any customer having issues with this.
> 
> A very knowledgable chap on this group sent a reply about latency on a 
> different thread & given what he does he would know if anyone does, but all I 
> can say is that in practice i've never had any issues with this in terms of 
> sync'd recordings except where recorders have been struggling with issues or 
> when using different machines. I guess it should have been pointed out at the 
> start of all this that recording with identical machines or at least from the 
> same manufacturer is the ideal way to do this.
> 
> --- In  "soundings23" <tony.whitehead2332@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll just get on and give it a go this weekend and see what it sounds like. 
> > Did you find any sync issues as suggested due to minutely different clock 
> > times on different devices? I image the differences are so slight it would 
> > only tell after quite a while?
> > 
> > --- In  "Jez" <tempjez@> wrote:
> > >
> > > CW means making two recordings on separate recorders at the same time - 
> > > its an interesting technique. We do it on the Wildeye courses from time 
> > > to time. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In  Chris Edwards <chris-yahoo@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, soundings23 wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I read that if you're recording soundcapes such as waves on a beach 
> > > > > multiple recording points are recommended. 
> > > > > (http://www.michaelgallagher.co.uk/archives/tag/chris-watson)
> > > > 
> > > > Reading that I'm unclear whether CW means multiple sync'd recordings, 
> > > > or, 
> > > > simply mixing multiple recordings which may have been made at different 
> > > > times.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU