Hi Peter,
By winged are you thinking of a boundary shaped somewhat like this...
_/\_
...where the corners of the m10 protrude through a slot at the vertex of ea=
ch side?
John Hartog
rockscallop.org
--- In Peter Shute <> wrote:
>
> Could placing the internal mics in a pair of "wings" gain any benefit fro=
m a boundary effect? The size of the wings would be limIted by the spacing.
>
> Peter Shute
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
> ________________________________
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Mon Feb 13 02:18:30 2012
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re: SASS construction/design question
>
>
>
> <<Do you mean cutting a slot shaped so just the mics protrude? I'd been w=
ondering the same thing and had considered trying it with my M10.
> I'm not very familiar with the principals involved, but this should resul=
t in increased volume, shouldn't it? Would it also increase directionality?=
>>
>
> The stereo provided by a SASS array works because it approximates the spa=
cing of the human ears as well as the baffle & boundary effect of the human=
head. Placing an M10 in a slot in the front of a SASS array will provide n=
one of those acoustic functions, since the spacing & baffling between mics =
won't be changed. Probably about the best that could be done to alter the M=
10 would be to incorporate it into a Jecklin disk array. I have no idea if =
you would find an improvement in stereo image, but it would be a lot easier=
to construct.
>
> Scott Fraser
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|