66s? If you already have more than one ME66 then surely using both together=
would be the first thing to try?=0D
=0D
Peter Shute=0D
=0D
=0D
--------------------------=0D
Sent using BlackBerry=0D
=0D
________________________________=0D
From: =0D
To: =0D
Sent: Sun Jan 22 03:56:07 2012=0D
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Mono to sterio=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
Thanks for the David, if were to look at replacing my 66s with a stereo mic=
what would replacement?=0D
=0D
David Darrell-Lambert=0D
Bird Brain UK=0D
Suite 11908, 2nd floor=0D
145-157 St John Street=0D
London EC1V 4PY=0D
=0D
Mobile 07977 407 550=0D
Mobile 07500 373 256=0D
<david%40birdbrainuk.com>=0D
=0D
www.birdbrainuk.com=0D
=0D
On 21 Jan 2012, at 15:47, "Avocet" <<brini%40dsl.=
pipex.com>> wrote:=0D
=0D
> > I was talking to a radio presenter the otherday who suggested I=0D
> > could convert my recordings from mono to sterio. Does the work well=0D
> > and is it easy to do?=0D
>=0D
> David,=0D
>=0D
> In short no and no. When stereo first came out there was a rash of=0D
> discs "doctored for stereo", but this was music.=0D
>=0D
> Methods include splitting the music up into frequency bands and=0D
> processing these for left and right, and adding stereo reverb. Adding=0D
> out of phase elements will also give a "space" effect which some=0D
> people mistake for stereo. It's like colouring up a monochrome photo -=0D
> it may be possible but is it valid?.=0D
>=0D
> What you can never get from a mono recording is placement of wildlife=0D
> sounds like a group of birds, or to follow a bird's movement.=0D
>=0D
> You can of course mix two or more recordings using panpots and create=0D
> a spread stereo image but that is really not what nature recording is=0D
> all about.=0D
>=0D
> David=0D
>=0D
> David Brinicombe=0D
> North Devon, UK=0D
> Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - Ambrose Bierce=0D
>=0D
>=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
=0D
|