naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: digital playback solutions

Subject: Re: digital playback solutions
From: "John" naturalcontemplative
Date: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:14 pm ((PST))
Thank you Mike, this raised some avenues of inquiry I had not considered.

Like a dock for the iPod that has a decent DAC? Or a toslink to analog inte=
rface for the minidisc? Anything that gets past the limited quality of the =
headphone jack. It also just occurred to me that the MZRH1 can switch betwe=
en headphone and line output and maybe the line out has better sound qualit=
y? I'll have to try that.

Scott's suggestion of staying with a Macbook with a good audio interface is=
 probably going to deliver the most satisfying result, but there may still =
be other, more portable, less expensive options.

Several options to investigate.

John

--- In  "Mike Rooke" <> wrote:
>
> Interesting post,
>
> Sounds like the problem is faithful transfer of the original content to t=
he PA? So your bound by the DAC quality of the portable device, what about =
using optical out to a DAC and then PA or system with e.g SPDIF input?
>
> My thoughts,
>
> ipad2 with the camera interface and a usb audio device - not much better =
than the laptop.
>
> Sony D50 with optical out to an amplifier / PA system with SPDIF in - sma=
ll but maybe difficult to cue&play
>
> Dedicated player like a Lynn Majik. - bigger than the laptop.
>
> Squeezebox (requires lan/wifi connection to the server) -> Optical out to=
 Amplifier, remote control, but in a live situation perhaps not good.
>
> Use optical out from the macbook -> Amplifier and loose the USB audio car=
d? - back to square 1.
>
> Heres a list of portable players:-
> http://wiki.xiph.org/PortablePlayers
>
> Although if you want to trigger playback or sequence during a performance=
 then
> something more music orientated such as a Muse box?
>
> http://www.museresearch.com/products/musebox.php
>
> or dedicated players:-
> http://flac.sourceforge.net/links.html
>
>
>
>
> --- In  "John" <jladd@> wrote:
> >
> > I just played a couple of .wav files through my PA system using all of =
the devices I have on hand: MZRH1 minidisc, Zoom H2, iPod touch, and my pow=
erbook with an external sound card (nothing fancy, just an old Xitel AN1 us=
b interface). The Powerbook/interface option sounds much better than any of=
 the others. Clearer overall, especially more detail in the low frequencies=
. All three portable devices sound pretty muddy to me, the H2 worst of all.
> >
> > So, does anyone know of a playback device that would be comparable in q=
uality to the Powerbook/Interface combination but more portable than a lapt=
op and perhaps more durable?
> >
> > John
> >
> > --- In  "John" <jladd@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I am looking for the best solution (although price is a factor) to hi=
gh quality playback in a concert setting (we use nature sounds along with c=
ompositions for harp and cello) and educational setting (I present on marin=
e conservation and cetacean communication). I have been using Quicktime on =
a Mac Powerbook for many years with an external USB audio interface (which =
delivers better quality than the headphone jack on the Powerbook). This wor=
ks fine, but since all I am doing is playing back audio files, I would rath=
er not have to drag my computer to every gig.
> > >
> > > I have tried using the iPod touch, but have not been impressed with t=
he sound quality coming out of that into a PA system. We are talking about =
whales here. Low frequencies need to be well reproduced. I also find naviga=
ting the iPod touch frustrating when on stage.
> > >
> > > Do any of you know of a compact, well-designed, high quality digital =
audio player that can play uncompressed WAV or AIF files? Well designed mea=
ns being able to easily arrange, rearrange and access the tunes on the play=
er, and play one at a time (the iPod plays in sequence without stopping. I =
can't stop the player while I'm playing the cello!).
> > >
> > > How do the digital recorders (PCM-M10, MZRH1, LS-7, H2, etc etc) comp=
are in terms of their digital to analog playback qualities? Is one of them =
more suitable than others for playback (I have an H2 and an MZRH1).
> > >
> > > What are others using for best quality performance of nature sounds?
> > >
> > > I will be comparing everything I have through our sound system, but w=
ondered what you all would have to say.
> > >
> > > Many thanks!
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > Let us live in harmony with the Earth
> > > And all creatures
> > > That our lives may be a blessing
> > >
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU