| Subject: | Re: ME66/MKH616 with omni mic |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
| Date: | Tue Feb 8, 2011 7:31 am ((PST)) |
Hi Mark, I have unfortunately no experience with the MKH416, but I have the even mor= e expensive MKH60 as well as the ME66/K6. The MKH 60 provides a subjectively lower inherent noise floor than the ME66= /K6. Due to its optimization for the human ear, it is however noisier at fr= equencies above about 10 kHz, where the ME66/K6 provides better results (wh= ich would be an issue for bioacoustic research). Regards, Raimund > I have looked at both the Sen ME66/K6 and the Sen MKH416. There is quite = a price > difference in these mics. I want to go with quality, thats really importa= nt to > me. Is it worth the extra 5-$600 to purchase the MKH416 over the ME66 to = get > what I am looking for? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [no subject], Avocet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ME66/MKH616 with omni mic, Marc Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ME66/MKH616 with omni mic, Tim Bartlett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ME66/MKH616 with omni mic, Marc Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU