Subject: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation? |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:38 am ((PDT)) |
<<There are a few relatively inexpensive large diaphragm microphones that have a Fig8 pattern. The one that occurs to me off hand is the CAD M179. It's typically available for about $200. But being a large diaphragm microphone it has relatively poor polar patterns. On the other hand, the Fig8 pattern is always the best pattern on a multi-pattern microphone.>> A problem with many of the Chinese-made, lower cost mics is that the frequency response & pattern in figure 8 is not symmetrical. The back side often sounds quite different from the front, which would make MS unusable. <<Personally, I'd prefer to use a small diaphragm microphone for the Fig8. That list is short: Schoeps Mk8 Sennheiser MKH30 Neumann KM120 AKG CK94>> MBHO also has a figure 8 capsule for its modular series of mics. Same general price range as above. There is also the Sennheiser MKH80, replaced now with the 800. Stratospheric though, about $3,000. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] looking for resources, Bernie Krause |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Mike Rooke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Mike Rooke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU