| Subject: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Eric Benjamin" ericbenjamin2 |
| Date: | Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:30 pm ((PDT)) |
> Steve Duncan wrote > the figure-8 mic, which seems to be the hard part You got that right! There are a few relatively inexpensive large diaphragm microphones that hav= e a Fig8 pattern. The one that occurs to me off hand is the CAD M179. It's typically available for about $200. But being a large diaphragm microphone= it has relatively poor polar patterns. On the other hand, the Fig8 pattern is= always the best pattern on a multi-pattern microphone. Personally, I'd prefer to use a small diaphragm microphone for the Fig8. T= hat list is short: Schoeps Mk8 Sennheiser MKH30 Neumann KM120 AKG CK94 The cheapest of these is the CK94 which ran about $820 the last I checked. Can anyone think of a good, inexpensive, Fig8 condensor microphone? I guess it's up to you to do it yourself! Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Steve Duncan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Steve Duncan |
| Previous by Thread: | Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Steve Duncan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Inexpensive M/S setup for experimentation?, Gregory O'Drobinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU