Subject: | Re: Tascam DR-680 specifications again |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund" animalsounds |
Date: | Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:40 pm ((PDT)) |
"But that begs the question - why include a block diagram of the signal flow if it doesn't accurately reflect the design of the recorder?" Hi Paul, In order to figure that out, I just ran a quick test with the low cut set to 120 Hz and recorded a 10 to 400 Hz sine sweep signal at two different recording levels:: http://www.avisoft.com/scratch/DR-680 sweep.wav http://www.avisoft.com/scratch/DR-680 sweep clipped.wav If the filter was located in the analog section in front of the ADC, then there should be no distortion at the lower frequencies below the cut-off frequency. However, it can be seen that sine signal is indeed distorted at those lower frequencies, where the recorder itself did not indicate any clipping. So, the block diagram is obviously correct. Tascam obviously chose that less than optimal design in order drop the price of the unit... Cheers, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Tascam DR-680 specifications again, Paul Jacobson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Tascam DR-680 specifications again, Paul Jacobson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR-680 specifications again, Paul Jacobson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Tascam DR-680 specifications again, Paul Jacobson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU