| Subject: | Re: Battery v phantom power |
|---|---|
| From: | "Mike Rooke" picnet2 |
| Date: | Tue Dec 1, 2009 5:19 am ((PST)) |
I think the NT4 via battery maybe nosier than via phantom. - Im not sure w= hen using battery power if the Rode mics are unbalanced? Not quite related... Cautionary tale: Watch the headphone level with the FR2-LE, I recenty popped the left speake= r element of my Sennheiser HD280 headphones. I move an NT1A around while it= was still on- I guess the lows were *really* low... pop went the speaker..= . FR2-LE is fine, interesting it allowed such a high level to the headphone= to destroy them. -Mike. Thinking of the NTG3... --- In "dsecomb2" <> wrote: > > Hi all > I was listening to a recording from a Rodes NTG 2 into a Fostex FR2-le. a= nd thought it was a bit noisy. The Rodes was powered by a battery. Would on= e get a clearer recording it phantom was used? > > Cheers David > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Battery v phantom power, D Secomb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Battery v phantom power, Flawn Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Battery v phantom power, D Secomb |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Battery v phantom power, Flawn Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU