Subject: | Re: Do we still love the NT1a? |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Wed Sep 9, 2009 6:12 pm ((PDT)) |
At 11:50 PM +0300 9/9/09, Marinos Koutsomichalis wrote: > Well, > >it wouldn' t be fair to make a direct comparison as the Nt1-a is a >really cheap microphone, and mainly a studio oriented one... >So let me make clear that what I don' t like is not the Nt1-a as a >microphone, but the Nt1-a as a microphone for natire and wildlife >recordings... > >Anyway, >First of all I don' t like large diaphragm microphones for nature >recordings, as they tend to colour sound and they are not detailed >enough in the high end, I've not encountered this performance characteristic with the NT1-A recordings I've made. For many of them I've been able to simultaneously compare their high response to that of much more expensive small diaphragm mics. Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Do we still love the NT1a?, Marinos Koutsomichalis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Do we still love the NT1a?, Marinos Koutsomichalis |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Do we still love the NT1a?, Marinos Koutsomichalis |
Next by Thread: | Re: Do we still love the NT1a?, Marinos Koutsomichalis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU