naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Do we still love the NT1a?

Subject: Re: Do we still love the NT1a?
From: "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts=
omichalis
Date: Wed Sep 9, 2009 8:44 am ((PDT))

If you ask me -=0D

I wouldn' t use them at all for nature recordings....=0D

Well I know that a lot do and that they swear on their name..=0D
and they may be ultra-quiet=0D

But I just don' t like their sound..... (for nature recordings..)=0D




On 09 =CE=A3=CE=B5=CF=80 2009, at 5:17 =CE=BC.=CE=BC., wildlifeanalysis wro=
te:=0D

> Hello=0D
>=0D
> I am looking to pick up another stereo microphone pair for some  =0D
> surround recordings, but before I do, I wanted to get the pulse of  =0D
> the community on the NT1a. After hearing a number of field  =0D
> recordings made with the NT1a, I am convinced that if I was just  =0D
> starting out nature recording, I would buy a couple of matched pairs
> and save myself thousands.=0D
>=0D
> Are there any new value contenders out there I should take a look  =0D
> at, or are the Rode NT1a's still the kings of low cost, ultra-quiet,
> mics?=0D
>=0D
> David=0D
>=0D
> =0D










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU