Subject: | LS-10 vs 702, ambience |
---|---|
From: | "vickipowys" vpowys |
Date: | Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:34 pm ((PDT)) |
All, Here is another comparison between Olympus LS-10 and Telinga stereo mic used open, against SD-702 with SASS and mkh 20s. The subject is ambience, nothing really close to the mics, with Noisy Miners and Red Wattlebirds in the distance. The rigs were set up side by side. This sound file can be found on the naturerecordists Files page, under R for RWB (Red Wattlebird). The sound file is of two parts: a. LS-10 with Telinga (no low cut, using low sensitivity volume 10) b. SD-702 with SASS Conclusion. The Telinga and LS-10 did very well noise-wise, and on the original 10 minute recording some very distant callers picked up on the Telinga, as well as the SASS. The SASS was quieter, picked up the lowest of background noise e.g. distant highway, was more spacious, had a better and more accurate stereo image. The Telinga gave a more central image. Vicki Powys Australia |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, vickipowys |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, vickipowys |
Next by Thread: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU