Re: LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?

Subject:	Re: LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?
From:	"Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date:	Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:55 am ((PDT))

> Conclusion, the LS-10 with Telinga is surprisingly good on the low
> rumbles.  It has a more central image than the SASS.

Thanks for these. The difference in imaging between the mic systems is
so great that it makes it hard to hear any difference in the preamps.

-Dan Dugan









"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, vickipowys Re: LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, Dan Dugan <=

Previous by Date:	LS-10 vs 702, ambience, vickipowys
Next by Date:	Zoom R16 ??, Greg ODrobinak
Previous by Thread:	LS-10 vs 702, how low can you go?, vickipowys
Next by Thread:	LS-10 vs 702, ambience, vickipowys
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU