| Subject: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience |
|---|---|
| From: | "oryoki2000" oryoki2000 |
| Date: | Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:13 am ((PDT)) |
"Raimund Specht" <> wrote: > Olympus LS-10 > > SENSE HIGH, LEVEL 10 (16 or 24 bit): > -122dBu(A) -119dBu(unweighted) > > SENSE HIGH, LEVEL 2 (16 or 24 bit): > -103dBu(A) -100dBu(unweighted) > > SENSE LOW, LEVEL 10 (24 bit): > -121dBu(A) -118dBu(unweighted) > > SENSE LOW, LEVEL 10 (16 bit): > -113dBu(A) -110dBu(unweighted) That's impressive performance from a device that costs less than $250. Her= e's an eBay reseller I have used in the past who is offering new, unopened = LS-10 for $228 shipped. This seller will ship to international addresses, = with extra shipping cost, of course. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3D250413193240 --oryoki |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Klas Strandberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Bernie Krause |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Klas Strandberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LS-10 vs 702, ambience, Bernie Krause |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU