Subject: | Re: Marantz PDM 661 Vs Fostex FR2 LE - which one should I buy??! |
---|---|
From: | "Marinos Koutsomichalis" marinoskouts= |
omichalis Date: Fri Jul 3, 2009 6:24 pm ((PDT)) well=0D then I think the 661 has a slight advantage as=0D with the same batteries I seem to get more or less 4-6 hours of =0D recording=0D On 03 =CE=99=CE=BF=CF=85=CE=BB 2009, at 9:25 =CE=9C=CE=9C, . m u r m e r . = wrote:=0D >=0D >=0D > Marinos Koutsomichalis wrote:=0D > > The fostex operates on 8 AAs but I am not sure for how long..=0D > >=0D >=0D > just a small correction - the fostex also runs on 4 AA's, not 8, and=0D > although i haven't specifically tested runtime, i'm guessing i get=0D > around 3-4 hours record time with phantom power using 2500mAh=0D > rechargables...=0D >=0D > best,=0D > patrick=0D >=0D > -- =0D >=0D > ||| www.murmerings.com |||=0D >=0D > =0D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Marantz PDM 661 Vs Fostex FR2 LE - which one should I buy??!, . m u r m e r . |
---|---|
Next by Date: | pcm-d50 plug-in power, mgoud |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Marantz PDM 661 Vs Fostex FR2 LE - which one should I buy??!, . m u r m e r . |
Next by Thread: | Re: Marantz PDM 661 Vs Fostex FR2 LE - which one should I buy??!, escalation746 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU