> I run a professional recording/mastering studio & one of the banes of =
> my existence is people bringing in files for mixing or mastering which =
> have been recorded at 48k. I can convert quickly, but at lower
> quality.
Hi Scott
Thanks for the input. When you convert 48 to 44.1 quickly, you say it is at=
lower quality. Will the resulting 44.1 file be lower quality than if you h=
ad recorded directly at 44.1 in the first place?
Also as yet I have not understood, is there any noticeable advantage for us=
to use even 96kHz, over 44.1kHz? IN particular if we will anyway be finall=
y converting the files to 44.1kHz CD format?
For example I read about aliasing distortions which apparently give 96kHz a=
n advantage. I can't say I understand what that really means, but am wonder=
ing, is that relevant or noticeable for our nature recordings?
Justin
|